As-Is vs To-Be Process Mapping
Part of the Business Analyst Roadmap
In short
You can't plan a better route if you don't know where you're standing. As-Is maps show today's reality. To-Be maps show the improved version. The difference between them is your project.
Documenting how a process currently works (As-Is) before designing how it should work (To-Be) — skipping the As-Is analysis often means redesigning around a misunderstood current state.

Think of it like this
Rearranging your hostel room
Before moving anything, you sketch where the bed, desk and cupboard are now, and notice you walk around the bed ten times a day. Then you sketch the new layout. Skip the first sketch and you might create a new problem while fixing the old one.
Watch it happen
College fee refund: today vs planned
As-Is
- Paper form signed by three offices
- Student chases each office in person
- Often takes around three weeks
To-Be
- One online form, routed automatically
- Status updates sent by SMS
- Target: under five working days
Map As-Is with the people doing the work, measure it, then design To-Be. The gap between them becomes the requirements.
The big ideas
What you need to know
As-Is is the honest picture
Include the workarounds, the waiting and the extra steps. A cleaned-up As-Is hides the problems you're meant to fix.
Measure the As-Is
Note time per step, waiting time and error rates. Numbers let you prove the To-Be is actually better.
To-Be is a design
Remove steps, merge handoffs, automate checks. Every change should link to a pain point from the As-Is.
Check To-Be is realistic
Validate it with the people who'll run it. A beautiful To-Be that ignores staff limits will be ignored.
Save yourself the pain
Common mistakes
Oops
Skipping As-Is because 'we already know it's bad'.
Do this instead
Map it anyway. You'll find steps that exist for a good reason and must be kept in the To-Be.
Oops
Designing To-Be around a tool you already picked.
Do this instead
Design the better process first, then choose tools that support it.
Your mission
Map a real As-Is and To-Be
Quick check
Why should you measure time and errors in the As-Is process?
Go deeper
- 1Map both an As-Is and a To-Be version of a hypothetical inefficient process.
- 2Learn why understanding the As-Is state, even when it's clearly broken, is still essential first.
- 3Practice identifying the specific gaps between As-Is and To-Be that justify the change.
More topics at this stop
Stuck on this topic? Ask an Insider
Get 1:1 guidance from people who've walked this exact path — on the InsideEdge app.