Statistical Significance in A/B Tests
Part of the Data Analyst Roadmap
In short
B converted at 10.8% and A at 10%. Is B better, or just lucky this week? Significance testing asks how surprising that gap would be if nothing had really changed.
Applying Phase 4's hypothesis testing directly to a live experiment — checking whether an observed difference between variants is likely real, not noise, before rolling out a change.

Think of it like this
The 'lucky' coin
Your friend flips a coin ten times, gets six heads, and calls it lucky. You shrug: six out of ten happens all the time with a normal coin. Sixty out of a hundred would be more convincing. Significance is asking how often plain luck would produce what you saw.
Watch it happen
Same rates, different sample sizes
1/5A converts 10.0%, B converts 10.8%, with 10,000 users each.
The big ideas
What you need to know
What a p-value means
If there were truly no difference, how often would you see a gap this big or bigger? Small p means rarely.
What it doesn't mean
p = 0.03 is not '97% chance B is better'. It's a statement about the data, assuming no effect.
Confidence intervals
A range of plausible true lifts. More useful than a yes/no, because it shows the size too.
Significant isn't always important
With huge samples, a 0.01% lift can be significant and still not worth the engineering cost.
See it in code
Walk through the code
1from statsmodels.stats.proportion import proportions_ztest, confint_proportions_2indep2 3conv = [1080, 1000] # B, A4users = [10000, 10000]5 6z, p = proportions_ztest(conv, users)7low, high = confint_proportions_2indep(conv[0], users[0], conv[1], users[1])8 9print(f"lift: {conv[0]/users[0] - conv[1]/users[1]:.2%}")10print(f"p-value: {p:.3f}")11print(f"95% CI for lift: {low:.2%} to {high:.2%}")1/4Conversions and users for each group, B first.
Prints a lift of 0.80%, a p-value near 0.06 and an interval that crosses zero. Not enough evidence yet.
Save yourself the pain
Common mistakes
Oops
Saying 'p = 0.06, so there's no effect.'
Do this instead
Say the test didn't find enough evidence. The interval shows a real effect is still possible.
Oops
Reporting only 'B won, p < 0.05.'
Do this instead
Report the lift and its confidence interval so people see how big the gain might be.
Your mission
Run the numbers
Quick check
A test gives p = 0.02 and a lift of +0.05% on a huge sample. What's the best reading?
Go deeper
- 1Calculate significance for a simple two-variant test using real or sample numbers.
- 2Learn why 'peeking' at results early and stopping on a good day inflates false positives.
- 3Practice explaining a non-significant result honestly, without over-interpreting it.
More topics at this stop
Stuck on this topic? Ask an Insider
Get 1:1 guidance from people who've walked this exact path — on the InsideEdge app.